From debugging to compliance, see how teams use Prela
"Agent failed in production. Print statements don't show the reasoning path. How do you debug?"
Agent fails with cryptic error
Run: prela last --status=error
View trace tree showing exact failure point
See full context: prompt, tools called, memory state
Replay with different model/parameters
Fix identified in 5 minutes (vs 2 hours with print debugging)
$ prela last --status=error
Trace ID: abc123-def456
Status: ERROR
Duration: 2.3s
├─ user_message: "Analyze this document..."
├─ llm_call (gpt-4): 1.2s
│ ├─ tokens: 2,340 in / 890 out
│ └─ cost: $0.12
├─ tool_call (search_docs): 0.8s
│ └─ ERROR: Connection timeout
└─ retry_recommended: true75% faster debugging (4 steps → 1 command: prela last)
"Can't write traditional unit tests for agents (non-deterministic outputs). How do you catch regressions?"
Write eval suite with semantic assertions
Run: prela eval suite.yaml --parallel
Eval runner executes test cases
JUnit reporter generates CI/CD-compatible output
GitHub Actions fails build if assertions fail
Catch regressions before production
# eval_suite.yaml
cases:
- name: "Customer support agent responds helpfully"
input:
prompt: "How do I reset my password?"
assertions:
- type: semantic_similarity
target: "Check your email for a password reset link"
threshold: 0.85
- type: tool_called
tool_name: "send_password_reset_email"Catch regressions before production with CI/CD integration
"Want to test GPT-4 vs Claude but don't want to re-execute expensive workflows. How do you compare?"
Run agent with GPT-4 (original execution)
Capture trace with full context
Replay with Claude-3.5 (no re-execution of tools/retrieval)
View semantic diff with similarity score
Compare cost ($0.60 vs $0.10 = 83% savings)
Make informed model selection decision
$ prela replay abc123 --model=claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 \
--temperature=0.3
Replaying trace abc123...
Original (GPT-4, temp=0.7):
"Here's a comprehensive analysis..."
Replay (Claude-3.5, temp=0.3):
"I'll provide a detailed breakdown..."
Semantic Similarity: 88%
Cost: $0.60 → $0.10 (83% savings)Compare outputs in seconds, not minutes (instant cost/quality analysis)
"Compliance asks 'Why did the agent make that decision?' How do you provide an audit trail?"
Compliance inquiry: 'Why did agent recommend Product X?'
Look up trace by timestamp or trace_id
View full execution context and retrieved documents
Export trace to PDF for compliance documentation
Show data lineage (which documents influenced output)
$ prela trace show tx-789 --format=detailed
Trace: tx-789
Timestamp: 2024-01-15 14:32:01 UTC
User: [email protected]
Execution Context:
├─ User Prompt: "Recommend a product for..."
├─ Retrieved Documents:
│ ├─ doc_001: Product X specifications
│ └─ doc_002: Customer reviews (4.8★)
├─ LLM Reasoning: "Based on requirements..."
└─ Final Output: "Product X recommended"
Data Lineage: doc_001 → 85% influenceAnswer regulatory inquiries with trace IDs and detailed execution logs
From cost tracking to performance optimization, Prela solves a wide range of AI agent challenges
Problem
Can't visualize agent communication in CrewAI/AutoGen
Solution
Agent graph visualization, delegation tracking
Understand collaboration patterns
Problem
Don't know how much LLM calls cost
Solution
Token counting, cost calculation, daily trends
Budget transparency and cost alerts
Problem
Agent makes unsupported claims
Solution
Hallucination detection with grounding checks
Catch errors before customers see them
Problem
Agent is slow, don't know why
Solution
Latency tracing, bottleneck identification
Find and fix performance issues
Join hundreds of teams building production AI agents with Prela
"Prela reduced our debugging time by 75%. We can't imagine building agents without it."
Engineering Lead
AI Startup
"The deterministic replay feature alone is worth the price. We A/B test models daily."
ML Engineer
SaaS Company
"Compliance was breathing down our neck. Prela gave us the audit trails we needed."
Platform Team Lead
Financial Services